reLAKSation 63. 

Seafood Weak!!: There is a train of thought that believes that to increase seafood consumption, it is easier to convince existing consumers to eat more than to persuade those who do not eat any seafood to eat even a small amount. The hurdle for increased consumption is greater for non-consumers than those who already include seafood in their diet. It is therefore not surprising that the main aim of National Seafood Week, which runs in the UK until 11th October is to convince consumers to be more adventurous when it comes to eating seafood. This means that this promotion is clearly aimed at the section of public, who already consumes seafood.

Over 70% of seafood sales are now made up of ‘old favourites’ like cod, haddock, plaice, salmon and prawns. Research from Seafish suggests that 90% of the UK of the population are not even aware that they could choose from over 100 different varieties of seafood. Seafish would like more consumers to try these different types of seafood, however is a promotion like National Seafood Week sufficient incentive to persuade them?

There is a clear distinction between trying to attract the attention of non-consumers and those who already buy seafood. The modern large supermarket is divided into specific areas displaying very different products. It is unlikely that a regular shopper will go up and down every aisle, as they already know what they want. This is one reason that supermarkets change the displays so that the shopper has to break their usual shopping pattern. Those consumers who never eat seafood are unlikely to even pass by the fresh fish counter, let alone stop to look at it. It would be extremely difficult to persuade such non-consumers to even visit the fish counter, if this was the aim of the promotion. However, this is a challenge which the aquaculture and fisheries industries must eventually face because it is clear that the majority of seafood consumers are now aged over 45.

Younger sections of the population rarely eat any seafood at all and there is a risk that as these consumers age, they will continue to refrain from purchasing any seafood at all. There is a view that once consumers reach their mid 40s they have more disposable income to spend on seafood and more time to cook it and therefore are more inclined to buy it. Yet, at the same time, consumers who have never eaten seafood previously are less likely to do so in later life. The challenge will be to persuade the younger age groups to start eating seafood whilst they are still young.

The younger age groups have grown up at a time when the supermarkets have dominated the retail sector. They are used to a convenience way of life. Many are deterred from buying seafood because of the fish heads, eyes, bones and skin and even the smell. Yet at the same time, the seafood industry is always keen to put on a display on the fish counter, which focuses on whole fish, especially large ugly ones. These may be fascinating to look at, but many consumers would never contemplate eating them.

Dealing with whole fish is natural to those who work in the seafood industry, but it is easy to forget how off-putting whole fish can be to the consumer, who does not like to be reminded of the association between the whole fish and the seafood that we eat. Yet, once again, National Seafood Week is launched at Billingsgate Market. This time celebrity fish chef Rick Stein is brought in to do the official functions but this association of celebrity chef, fish and Billingsgate is not newsworthy enough to bring this promotion to the attention of the wider media. Perhaps, something different is now necessary.

In much the same way that the launch of the promotion was not newsworthy, the promotion itself has not managed to raise much interest. As supermarkets are now the main source of seafood in the UK, it was inevitable that the organisers should include them in the plans. These would include cookery demonstrations and recipe ideas. However, observations from several supermarkets have indicated that the promotion has proceeded with more of a whimper than a bang. Given that the intention is to persuade existing consumers to try alternative species, there has been no real evidence of anything different on the supermarket fish counter, nor has there been any promotional material available to point consumers in the right direction. In fact the only evidence of the promotion at all are small signs, in a few supermarket stores declaring that “we support National Seafood Week”. Presumably, consumers interested in the promotion will have to find out what it means themselves.

It has not all been bad news. One supermarket chain has been running a competition as part of National Seafood Week, which is even in the spirit of the promotions’ aims. This is a competition to guess the mystery fish by stating four different names under which it is known. The fish is actually dogfish for those who might like to enter. However, other than the competition leaflet, most consumers would be unaware that this promotion was actually in progress.

With supermarkets now dominating the retail seafood sector, the few remaining independent fishmongers would be expected to make much more effort out of this promotion. Unfortunately, this does not seem to be the case with a random sample of fishmongers visited during the week showing no signs of the promotion at all.

The problem for such promotions is that in today’s sophisticated retail market, they are simply too vague to work. We are not suggesting that this is the case here, but this type of promotion can often be simply justification for the existence of an organisation than for the expected results that they might bring.

We at Callander McDowell, believe that if consumers are to be encouraged to eat alternative fish species, then they must be given an incentive to try these species. A poster, which in this case does not even tell them to do so, is just not enough. The promotion needs to be more targeted in its approach. For example, Seafish would like consumers of cod, haddock, plaice and salmon to try something else. If Seafish would like consumers to try more dogfish, then when a customer buys a piece of cod, haddock plaice or salmon, then give them small piece of dogfish as well, which they can take home and try. This would be little different from the BOGOF type of offer used extensively throughout all supermarket chains. Alternatively, offer these different species at a discounted price, when customers buy the popular species.

Of course, this costs money but surely it is preferable to use promotional funds to subsidise the consumption of these different species rather than on printing costs for posters telling them (or not) to try these other seafood products.

The modern shopping arena is changing. The seafood industry must change with it or be left behind. This is something that the aquaculture industry can also take on board.

Back to reLAKSation