reLAKSation 47.

Snails pace?: The new fish labelling legislation continues to be under the microscope. The new IntraFish newspaper reports that many French retailers, both independent and giants alike, have still not managed to comply with the new legislation. This is not in the least bit surprising, since as the paper suggests many retailers are still trying to find the best way to present the information to their customers, especially on the fresh fish counter.

However, whilst many stores have yet to respond to the challenge of labelling loose fresh fish, new labels have started to appear on some pre-packed chilled fish. This is happening mainly on packs of fish where supplies are most predictable, for example farmed salmon.  Examples of such labels from the UK market include the following:  

FARMED IN SCOTLAND

FARM REARED IN SCOTTISH WATERS

FARMED IN NORWAY

FARMED IN CHILE

Certainly in the UK market, farmed salmon is increasingly being labelled with the correct information. This is not yet widespread because some retailers have said that they are using up old labels first, especially whilst they wait for the relevant statutory instruments to be implemented by the UK government.

However, the real question is whilst consumers have a right to all possible information about the food they buy, are they that interested in what the label actually says?

The Food Standards Agency in Scotland released the results of the latest Scottish Consumer Omnibus when they exhibited at the Fishing and Aquaculture exhibitions in Glasgow. This market research asked 1001 consumers, which factors most influenced their purchase of fish. Not surprisingly, the most important factor was the appearance of the fish or pack. If this were not attractive the consumer would not even bother to consider buying it.

The second most important factor was taste, although presumably this refers to fish products to which consumers have some familiarity and therefore is only relevant to repeat purchases.

After taste, consumers are most influenced by price, which is not unexpected. Certainly, the low price of salmon has stimulated sales and therefore must be a major driver of consumer choice.

Appearance, taste and price all figure highly in this survey and all have produced percentages in double figures. By comparison, all the other factors hardly figure in the results. These can be summarised as follows:

Information on labels – 2%

Production methods –2%

Wild or farmed fish? –2%

Environmental concerns – less than 1%

Country of origin – less than 1%.

This confirms in part earlier research by the International Salmon Farmers Association who found that country of origin was of little importance to consumers. Back in early 2000, the Scottish industry’s representative organisation implied that many UK supermarkets were misleading their customers by not identifying the country of origin. It will now be interesting to see whether this new labelling changes consumer opinion and they opt to select the salmon they buy on the additional information now provided on these labels.

 

Breathing space: The news that the European Commission has promised Norwegian salmon farmers that no measures would be taken to change their current market access will not have pleased everyone working in the international salmon industry. However, it was clearly the right decision. According to IntraFish, further investigations now mean that it is unlikely that there will be a new salmon agreement before next year.

We, at Callander McDowell, would hope that the European Commission finally realise that such further investigations are a total waste of time and that as we have repeatedly suggested, the European Salmon Agreement should now be allowed to run its course and then elapse for good.

The salmon agreement is simply an artefact of the old production-led strategies and in much the same way that the industry must move away from these production-led strategies to those, which are market-led, then it also must leave the salmon agreement and the associated dumping allegations behind. It is time to move on

The salmon agreement was imposed at a time when there was still some focus on country of origin. As we have already seen, country of origin is now of little importance to consumers. The changing ownership of farms means that the distinction between where and by whom, salmon is produced has become increasingly blurred. Less than 10% of European salmon is actually Scottish or Irish owned. It is increasingly clear than in terms of production and the market, salmon is salmon is salmon.

When consumers buy salmon, their decision is not whether they buy Scottish or Irish or Norwegian fish, but rather should they buy salmon or some other fish or even chicken, meat or pizza. The focus must now be on the market, not on what happens in Brussels.

 

Multiple streaming:   Celebrity chef, Nick Nairn, who was extremely entertaining when he gave his cookery demonstrations on the EWOS stand at the Glasgow Aquaculture Exhibition, told fishupdate.com that there was a danger that attempts to keep up with the volumes of salmon produced by Norway and Chile could be the death knell to the Scottish industry. He suggests that some large-scale producers focus too much on volume rather than the quality. He sees this as being a threat to what should be a leading Scottish food product. 

However, at the same time, he suggests the industry needs to get a cheaper product into schools, canteens and hospitals in order to persuade more people to eat more fish. He says that it should be a major part of Scotland’s diet.

Yet, the budget for meals in schools, hospitals and canteens is often measured in pence rather than pounds. If salmon is be produced at a cost to meet this sort of budget, then the focus must be on the low cost production, which Mr Nairn would like to reject.

  We, at Callander McDowell, have argued for sometime that salmon production does not have to be one thing or another. It can be both with production streamed to meet the needs of both quality or volume production. In fact, there is no reason why production cannot be tailored to meet the needs of several different market requirements at the same time.

Many of the past problems experienced by the salmon industry have arisen because some producers believe Scotland can only be a producer of premium quality salmon and nothing else. The reality is that, whether produced in Scotland or anywhere else, salmon can be whatever the market wants it to be.

Back to reLAKSation