reLAKSation 194.

Another world: According to Intrafish, Lars Liabo of Kontali Analyse said that he believes a jump in salmon prices being transferred to shop shelves is inevitable. This was not a difficult prediction to make, since we at Callander McDowell had already reported that there had been some upward price movements in the UK supermarkets. Mr Liabo reported that so far, salmon prices in French and Spanish supermarkets remain unchanged.

The EUSPG and the European Commission assume that low salmon prices have been due to the presence of dumped Norwegian imports. The logical argument suggests that if import prices can be raised by the imposition of tariffs, then higher prices will filter down the supply chain and this will be reflected in the supermarkets as a fair price which consumers will be prepared to pay. Unfortunately, both the EUSPG and the European Commission are mistaken. The EUSPG are simply uninterested in what the consumer wants and therefore have little idea as to what happens in the supermarkets. Equally, the Commission focused just on the question of whether dumping has occurred, that they never considered whether other factors are responsible for the changes to the marketplace that prompted the EUSPG to accuse Norway of dumping.

For example, one of the most important influences on the retail price of salmon in the UK is the price war taking place between supermarkets. Comparisons between the price of salmon in the leading supermarkets show how identical prices are. When one supermarket breaks ranks and cuts the price, the others follow. Alternatively, as in the case of the recent duties, a small price rise by one supermarket prompted the others to follow. However, some supermarkets are not always so keen to follow. Whilst the packs of chilled packs has risen, most supermarkets have left the fresh fish from the fish counter at the same price. This is driven by the desire to remain the most competitively priced.

The aim to be the market leader is the single most influential factor for driving salmon priced downwards. This week it’s been possible to see this competitive drive in action.

Although the supermarket chain Sainsbury’s has been suffering from a downturn in sales, it has become a dominant seller of salmon. This is not because Sainsbury’s prices have been the lowest, but rather that they almost permanently have salmon on some form of promotion . Their regular promotion is to offer their 360g pack of salmon fillets priced at £5.99 on Buy One Get One Free.

 

The leading supermarket chain in Britain is Tesco’s and they have been losing out on salmon sales, despite offering their salmon fillet at £5.97/kg. Tesco’s normally sell their chilled salmon fillet  in packs of varying weight. This week, they have a special promotion of salmon fillet in packs of 360g (sounds familiar) on Buy One Get One Free (sounds even more familiar) but these packs are priced at £4.99 undercutting Sainsbury’s by £1/pack or £1.39/kg. This undercutting is despite salmon being at it’s highest price this year.

                                             

This is clear proof that salmon prices are not controlled by what is happening in Norway as the EUSPG suggest but rather by the supermarkets  providing consumers with what they want – a value for money, everyday meal.

In Tesco this week, customers couldn’t get to buy enough salmon. The offer was just too good to miss. The problem for the EUSPG and the European Commission is that they just haven’t got a clue to what is really driving the market. Their combined actions will not result in a sustained higher price; the supermarkets will see to that. Both the EUSPG and the European Commission need to face up to the realities of the marketplace. They cannot force the supermarkets nor consumers to accept their idea of what the salmon market should be. They both live in another world.

Milking it… : Whilst the European Commission is busy putting duties on imported Norwegian salmon, Scottish Quality Salmon is equally busy offering retailers cash incentives to promote farmed salmon as a rich source of the omega-3 fatty acids. SQS told Intrafish that most consumers are unaware of the health benefits of eating oily fish such as salmon. Half of the monies for this promotion come from the European Commission’s structural fund through a FIFG grant. The irony of this situation where with one hand, the EU are restricting supplies of farmed salmon and on the other hand are encouraging consumers to eat more is not lost on us at Callander McDowell.

This week, a collaboration of Scottish companies and organisations launched a new website – richinomega3.com  with the help of the athlete Roger Black to promote the health benefits of omega-3 fatty acids. At the same time, fishupdate.com reported that Scottish schools are to be told to serve at least two portions of oil rich fish a week under a new healthy eating drive. The new campaign was launched by ex Miss UK Nicola Jolly. However, hardly had the campaign begun that Ian McKay, managing director of Seafish UK Ltd reported that the company had been supplying omega-3 rich fishcakes to schools for the last eighteen months and that sales had been much below expectation. He said that children’s taste palates were not ready for the higher omega-3 content of such products. As about seven out of ten people do not eat fish, it may take more than a FIFG backed promotional campaign to persuade people to eat any of the oily varieties, let alone enough to meet the minimum needs.

SQS may have an uphill battle on their hands. Fish may be the best source of omega-3 fatty acids, but consumers are being provided with an increasing number of alternative options. Besides the usual omega-3 rich capsules which are widely available in supermarkets, pharmacies and health food shops, this week British retailer Marks & Spencers launched supermilk, milk containing ten times the level of omega-3s than in ordinary milk. The milk comes from about 1000 cows which have been fed a blend of human grade fish oils. The milk tastes identical to normal milk. It costs 69p for a 750ml carton.

However, consumers may not even have to drink the enriched milk to improve the health of the heart. A new study, reported in the Daily Telegraph, found that those who drank a lot of milk were 12% less likely to have a heart attack and almost half as likely to suffer a stroke.

Consumers do not have to rely on just milk for added omega-3’s. Columbus eggs also contain increased levels of omega-3 and from next year, some Kellogg’s breakfast cereals will also contain added omega-3s. Consumers clearly have a choice and whilst oily fish are undoubtedly the best source of such fatty acids, they are not necessarily the source of choice.

This is why it is absolute lunacy that the European Commission has placed dumping duties on farmed salmon from Norway. If there was one single way to deter consumers from buying farmed salmon, it is to make it more expensive. This is a sure fire way to encourage consumers to seek alternatives, especially, when oily fish are not a normal part of the diet anyway. Community salmon producers cannot supply sufficient salmon to meet current demand, yet whilst the Commission is helping promote increased consumption, it is also says that it doesn’t want it to be too popular. Its hardly worth SQS milking the FIFG programme for promotional funds when consumers now have milk as an alternative. 

With regret: Hoove Salmon, the farm belonging to EUSPG Chairman, Angus Grains has called in the receiver. The Shetland News (www.shetland-news.co.uk ) suggests that the company has lost the fight against global concentration in salmon farming. Whilst we are saddened by any farm closure and the ensuing loss of jobs, we are not convinced that global concentration is to blame. Undoubtedly the salmon industry has changed in recent years, necessitating a change to the whole culture of salmon farming to which some companies have been slow to respond. However, other factors may also be apparent.

The most obvious is that Hoove Salmon, like nearly all the other salmon farms which have gone bankrupt since the end of 2003, was located in Shetland. The Shetland salmon industry has certainly suffered in recent years, partly due to the remote location which adds to the costs but also because many farms are small family run businesses. Yet, there are similar farms in Orkney and the Western Isles and they seem to have survived.

In common with many others working in a geographically diverse industry, we, at Callander McDowell, are very reliant on the news services for information. We do not have specific knowledge of the way some of these companies are set up, but one pattern that seems to be noticeable is that some, and we stress some but not all, of the Shetland companies that have gone into receivership are owned or run by individuals who operate a number of different salmon farming companies. A second pattern is that these companies appear to be deeply in debt to the local investment firm Shetland Development Trust. In the case of Hoove Salmon, the balance of their outstanding loan was £1.87 million. According to Shetland News, Hoove Salmon was also a major player in SSG Seafoods, another company that collapsed at the end of 2003 owing around £7 million to local community investment funds. SSG Seafoods was also managed by Mr Grains.

According to the Shetland Salmon Farmers Association website (www.fishuk.net  ), Mr Grains also operates the salmon farming company Fornaness Salmon. This company was established when Mr Grains, together with former owner John Goodlad, acquired the assets of the collapsed Cro Lax Salmon from the receivers. Cro Lax Salmon owed £250,000 to the Shetland Development Trust, a debt which has been subsequently written off.

Whilst Shetland salmon farms are having a hard time due to competition, not only from Norwegian imports but also from much larger Scottish farms, it is clear that the way in which some of these salmon farming companies are set up and managed may have something to do with the number of localised business failures, rather than the state of the international salmon industry.

How popular is salmon?: The Observer newspaper reports that this weekend, a Bank Holiday in the UK is set to be the ‘Night of the Big Heat’ where hundreds of thousands of men are completing their plans to reignite their love with their single annual encounter with culinary enterprise: the barbecue.

Leading supermarket chain Tesco predicted that over this weekend it would sell a record 450,000 burgers, 475,000 beef steaks, 450,000 salmon steaks, 50,000 tuna steaks, 400 kilos of prawns and 5.5 million packets of sausages. The fact that Tesco expect to sell the same number of salmon steaks as it does burgers, a barbecue staple, indicates how popular salmon has become. This is a key statistic that should not be forgotten.

 Back to reLAKSation